Zizek On Science And Religion
“Science today effectively does compete with religion, insofar as it serves two properly idelogical needs, those for hope and those for censorship, which were traditionally taken care of by religion.. … In a curious inversion, religion is one of the possible places from which one can deploy critical doubts about today’s society. It has become […]
“Science today effectively does compete with religion, insofar as it serves two properly idelogical needs, those for hope and those for censorship, which were traditionally taken care of by religion..
… In a curious inversion, religion is one of the possible places from which one can deploy critical doubts about today’s society. It has become one of the sites of resistence.”
In these lines (from pps 69-70 of Violence) Zizek highlights what is clear to any critical reader of the new atheism (Dawkins, Hitchens and co.); that it functions as a secular kind of fundamentalism. This is not a new insight.
What is more compelling is the role Zizek assigns to religion. Rather than the future of marginal voicelessness that many church leaders fear, the church has a place as a “site of resistance” able to express “critical doubts about today’s society.”. In support of this argument Zizek quotes John Gray “…churches have become sanctuaries of doubt” in contrast to science’s “refuge from uncertainty.”
The point shouldn’t be lost on theologians, apologists and church leaders. If the church has something unique to offer in our cultural moment then it will be found in resistance, critical thinking, doubt and uncertainty -which is another way of saying it will be found in offering people the space to think.
The question, of course, is what happens when folks walk through the doors of a local church. Will they find a “thinking space” or will they be confronted by something else.
