The Music, Worship, Performance and Leadership Thing

The ques­tion of “per­form­ance” arose in response to the “Lead­er­ship and Jazz” dis­cus­sion. There is a rel­ev­ant con­nec­tion here with the role of music in church life. I’m sure you have either read or heard the sug­ges­tion that “wor­ship is not a performance.”

On one level I agree that anyone involved in music in a church con­text needs to under­stand how what they are doing in church dif­fers from a con­ven­tional con­cert. Moreover, as a pastor, I’ve had to deal with the egos and cre­at­ive needs of musi­cians and wor­ship leaders.

How­ever, as a musi­cian, I find the notion that wor­ship music is not a per­form­ance at best mis­lead­ing and at worst, out­right harmful.

Music is always per­form­ance — always. Want a church music group that doesn’t per­form? Then, brace your­self for off-key singing, out of tune gui­tars, random drum pat­terns and lots and lots of feed­back and noise from poor qual­ity amp­li­fic­a­tion. As a musi­cian, I’m never not per­form­ing — never. Moreover, as a wor­ship­per I’m not keen on being in a room with non-performing musi­cians either. I’d rather have silence thanks!

The real issue is not whether the musi­cians are “per­form­ing” but what “func­tion” the music is serving. In the Berklee Film Scor­ing course, I encountered a very help­ful dis­tinc­tion — between abso­lute and func­tional music.

Abso­lute music is any piece of music cre­ated for pure listen­ing enjoy­ment. Self-sufficient, it doesn‚Äôt depend on ref­er­ence to any­thing out­side of itself to com­plete its mean­ing. It is music enjoyed by the listener at a con­cert or other live per­form­ance, or as a record­ing. ‚ÄúAbso­lute‚Äù music is without styl­istic limitations‚Äîit may be clas­sical, jazz, rock, or any other style.

Func­tional music is music that is cre­ated to serve another pur­pose besides being simply music. It can be a subtle accom­pani­ment or a driv­ing force that pro­pels a spe­cific event. Its ini­tial pur­pose is to sup­port some dra­matic, artistic, or social activity.”

Church wor­ship music was cited as an example of func­tional music (along with film music, com­puter game music, etc). Some­times func­tional music can become abso­lute music (John Wil­li­ams’ scores for the Star Wars films come to mind). But the test of func­tional music is always its abil­ity to com­ple­ment and strengthen the con­text it is writ­ten to func­tion within.

I believe that “func­tion­ing to sup­port another pur­pose” is a far more useful concept, if we are talk­ing to musi­cians, than “avoid­ing per­form­ance.” It puts ideas like talent, effort, skill and artistry in con­text (rather than in denial). Moreover, it helps us address the com­plex issue of the role of creativity.

Tech­nor­ati Tags: ,

12 Responses to “The Music, Worship, Performance and Leadership Thing”

  1. Paul says:

    ok i am out my depth so maybe some­thing for the muso’s amongst us to muse on…

    I wonder if we chris­ti­ans have func­tional music more often because they have the lyrics first and then try and work out a tune rather than cre­at­ing great music and then fit­ting words…

    It just made me think about U2 as an example of how they create as a band but often have great tunes first and words second and describe the moments it comes together like when God walks through the room… which is one of the great stor­ies about how the song One came about, band about to split up, tired, cre­ativ­ity low but a great tune being played and Bono stumbles into singing some lyrics…

    What are those of you who are more know­ledgable about the pro­cess think?

  2. Steve Lowe says:

    Thanks, this is helpful.

    Our wor­ship band had a meet­ing a couple of weeks ago and our WL used the word ‘per­form­ance’ sev­eral times in the con­text of ‘during the per­form­ance do..’ It was taken the wrong way, I think, by a few mem­bers. One was threat­en­ing to quit over it. Secretly, I wish she had, but that’s the wordly side of me :/

    For sure we’re not up on that plat­form to ‘per­form’ in the ‘look at me, I am gewd!’ sense, but we are up there to ‘per­form’ in the ‘I’m per­form­ing my task to the best of my God-given abil­it­ies’ sense.

    The functional/absolute dis­tinc­tion is valu­able. P&W music isn’t gen­er­ally very excit­ing music, at least from a musician’s stand­point. The fact the music is express­ing love, ador­a­tion, and wor­ship of our Father is what gives it mean­ing and makes it exciting.

  3. Becky Wright says:

    Inter­est­ing dis­tinc­tion between “abso­lute” and “func­tional” music. As Chris­ti­ans, I have seen that many Chris­ti­ans (erro­neously??) assume that Chris­tian musi­cians & song­writers should ONLY create music OVERTLY for wor­ship. Years ago, when I was young AND a young Chris­tian, I made that judg­mental mis­take. I judged people like B.J. Thomas, and later Amy Grant, because they were cre­at­ing music that was not “overtly” Chris­tian. In my imma­tur­ity as a believer, I thought that was wrong.

    I’ve long since come to real­ize that ALL our lives, ALL our tal­ents, ALL our work (as teach­ers, doc­tors, con­struc­tion work­ers, admin­is­trat­ors [even in church], paint­ers, artists of ANY sort, PARENTS, pas­tors, social work­ers, etc.) is SACRED. Our lives, even our MUSIC is not com­part­ment­al­ized in that respect. ALL that we do should be with EXCELLENCE, SKILL, and dili­gence. Any­thing less is an INSULT to the God Who gifted us.

    I under­stand how the member of the wor­ship team got upset at the word “per­form­ance”, mis­un­der­stand­ing the intent of the semantics. For example, our own wor­ship team prac­tices dili­gently (and, by the way, we DO have some very excit­ing music!!! If we don’t, we WRITE SOME!!). We rehearse until it feels nat­ural, so that our own per­sonal wor­ship on Sundays, as we lead the con­greg­a­tion to focus upon God, is not thwarted because we’re uncom­fort­able or unfa­mil­iar (or unpre­pared) with the music. God deserves no less. AND, as musi­cians, we would (frankly– as was aluded to in the ini­tial art­icle) be UNSATISFIED with less. A poor “per­form­ance” is CERTAINLY a hindrance to wor­ship, whether you’re on the stage or in the pew.

    Call it what you will. We per­form for our FATHER, as a little child would dance or sing a song or color a pic­ture for their loving parent to “ahh” and “oohh” over in ador­a­tion and appre­ci­ation of their child’s offer­ing of love and affec­tion. As the con­greg­a­tion joins us in singing to our Father, with EXCELLENT music (well “per­formed”), this con­sum­ma­tion of ador­a­tion, vari­ous emo­tions, the truth of the Word of God in the songs, the sound of voices and instru­ments IN TUNE and in one accord, can take place and not be hindered by a lazy, poor “performance”.

    God deserves the best. As Martin Luther (who star­ted the Reform­a­tion and birthed the modern-day evan­gel­ical church) said, “Why should the devil have all the good music?” Well said.

    Per­form your best– for an audi­ence of ONE! Every­one in the con­greg­a­tion will follow along and point their atten­tion UPWARD, with no (musical) hindrances, at least!! http://www.beckywrightsongs.com http://www.indieheaven.com/artists/becky_wright (Becky Wright is up for her first DOVE Award with the Gospel Music Association!)

  4. Toni says:

    To me, it’s all about the pur­pose and focus of the music we create.

    Yes­ter­day morn­ing I saw a bit from a Del­er­i­ous DVD. The band were into it and the audi­ence dan­cing away. Then I caught the lyrics, and it was a wor­ship song that I’d hap­pily use in church. Some­thing jarred badly, but it wasn’t until now that I could put my finger on it. It wasn’t that the band were doing the wrong thing — they were enter­tain­ing — but instead the music was wrong for the pur­pose, with every­one focussed on the stage show and party.

    Now it may be wrong to judge it like that, but this is my take. I’ve played for a few ‘wor­ship’ ses­sions with a very ser­i­ous band, where we put on a show using wor­ship songs where it felt far from the heart of worship.

    I guess the flip side is one of my bug­bears. ‘Wor­ship’ bands that are trying so hard not to be involved and per­form­ing that you just wish for more energy, drive and dynam­ism. I don’t want the light­show, but I do want to see the wor­ship lead­ing team look­ing like they are going for it for God and us; lead­ing the way with energy and desire. Too often it’s tight, con­trolled and sounds just like some theatre show­band instead of people eager to wor­ship and praise their God.

  5. Phil Reilly says:

    There’s some good dis­cus­sion here and a bunch of points I’d want to take fur­ther but they are per­haps sep­ar­ate to the post you’ve given Fernando.

    Cre­ativ­ity, per­form­ance and our weak­ness to be praised by others is some­thing I guess we all will hold in ten­sion through­out our lives. For myself it’s been a struggle and no matter what we call it or get our heads around it, it will be there.

    I’ve been at con­certs like The Doves, U2, Cold­play, Muse and a bunch of others accom­plished bands and have come away think­ing — do you know what, I encountered God tonight. I guess seee­ing the Creator’s hand in the cre­ativ­ity and delight of the musi­cians was jour­ney, in some small way, into the Heav­enly. Or on the other side, I’ve wor­shipped at a L’Arche com­munity with folks with vary­ing degrees of dis­ab­il­ity and cog­nit­ive under­stand­ing, who clapped out of sync, sung out of tune and there in the midst of a cacauphony of noise I encountered God in a very real and tan­gible way.

    I like gui­tars that are in tune, vocal­ists who know how to sing, tight bands and drum­mers who kick some… bass drum! Do I want them to per­form? Well depends if I paid good money to be enter­tained. But I’m not at Church to be enter­tained. But like I said, I appre­ci­ate (being a musi­cian myself) good musi­cian­ship. But it is not the be all and end all in me encoun­ter­ing God — I’m glad I don’t have to rely on that. I try through my feeble­ness to become atuned with the Spirit. Lets be honest, we know when people are per­form­ing for per­form­ance’ sake… per­son­ally, I get a little turned off at that.

    Not sure if this has even been remotely helpful…

  6. Paul, thanks for the com­ment. I’m asking a few more musi­cians I know to com­ment or email about this dis­cus­sion for some altern­ate points of view.

  7. Steve — thanks for your com­ment; looks like we are on sim­ilar wavelengths.

    Without doubt there are two dif­fer­ent ways we can use the word “per­form” and that is part of what can be con­fus­ing inthese sorts of discussions.

  8. Becky — thanks for the com­ment and for the reminder of what the ulti­mate goal and focus of all this should be.

  9. Toni — good examples. That “detached” approach is what I also seen as a con­sequence of the mis­un­der­stand­ing of “per­form­ance.” I’ve been in churches where musi­cians have been genu­iely afraid to look like they are either trying or enjoy­ing their musical task. That’s not the “heart of wor­ship” is it?

  10. Phil — the way you con­tras­ted exper­i­ences of God at dif­fer­ent levels of musical talent is power­ful, thank you for shar­ing that.

    In terms of what I’m work­ing through here, I don’t see per­form­ance and enter­tain­ment as being the same thing. I agree with you fully that I’m not at church to be enter­tained (though many are). How­ever, I’m not sure there is a uni­ver­sal agree­ment on when musi­cians are simply trying to enter­tain only. In fact, it seems to me that’s its one of the least agreed upon areas of wor­ship ministry.

    For example, I recall being pulled up on ce for per­form­ing in church, having taken a “loud solo.” In fact I was play­ing a writ­ten part, as per instruc­tion and whilst the person quizz­ing me was con­vinced I was obvi­ously “get­ting off on the atten­tion,” I was actu­ally strug­gling through a counter-melody I didn’t enjoy and had asked to be dropped during rehersal. I did my best with it, but I sure wasn’t “per­form­ing” in the sense my inter­locutor suggested.

  11. jay upp says:

    I totally agree in the aspect that wor­ship serves as our per­form­ance funtion to God, if we aren’t pre­pared to per­form in front of an audi­ence, it can become a mass dis­aster. I think there should be a bal­ance of rev­er­ence and per­form­ance. i’ve seen with older gen­er­a­tions, its rev­er­ence, and with a younger gen­er­a­tion pastor or lead­er­shi team, its per­form­ance (way overtly per­form­ance). as smart muscans and wor­ship­pers though, we should rely on the spirit of God to direct our paths, obvi­ously not only in wor­ship. but for example, i was at a sarah groves con­cert (my wife likes her) and just sit­ting there watch­ing the con­e­cert, and the band was fin­ish­ing a song and just star­ted to wor­ship and this bass player she had, he was prob. 21 or some­thing just began to tear it up, not in a a look at me way, but as stated before “his per­form­ance”. it was prob­ably the jaz­zi­est, greatest improv solo­ing i have ever seen. when they finally stopped, sarah groves was basic­ally in tears and com­men­ted on his great abil­ity and aware­ness of God in that peice. my judge­ment of per­form­ing to a crowd in wor­ship changed right then and there. God has placed this hunger for per­form­ance and musical skill and abil­ity in us for a reason, just as long as we remem­ber rev­er­ence in our per­form­ance, i think God looks highly upon it, as matt redman sings, “Let the songs of the saints be like sweet smelling incense”, that is what its about to me anyway.

  12. Jay — thanks for the com­ment and examples!

Switch to our mobile site