Baudrillard Was Right

Whilst I was in the UK, I was amazed by the TV advert from the See Amer­ica Cam­paign, which tries to attract UK tour­ists to the US. As the NYT put it

The $4 mil­lion cam­paign, by the Los Angeles office of the Brit­ish agency M&C Saat­chi, plays heav­ily on the Brit­ish love of Amer­ican movies, as illus­trated by the theme ”You’ve seen the films, now visit the set.” Print, tele­vi­sion and bill­board ads will fea­ture clips from films like ”Thelma and Louise,” ”Sweet Home Alabama” and ”L.A. Story” (but pre­sum­ably not ”Deliv­er­ance” or ”The Ice Storm”).”

What fas­cin­ated me is how this cam­paign con­firms Jean Baudrillard’s claim that the US inverts the rela­tion­ship between relaity and the cine­matic that exists. Gen­er­ally, we tend to judge films based on how well they convey the truth of the real world. How­ever, through film most tour­ists and trav­el­lers to the US have a heav­ily formed impres­sion and tend instead to judge the US in terms of how well it con­veys the truth of film. As Baudril­liard puts it

Is it not the least of America‚Äôs charms that even out­side the movie theatres the whole coun­try is cine­matic? The desert you pass through is like the set of a West­ern, the city a screen of signs and for­mu­las. It is the same feel­ing you get when you step out of an Italian or a Dutch gal­lery into a city that seems the very reflec­tion of the paint­ings you have just seen, as if the city had come out of the paint­ings and not the other way about. The Amer­ican city seems to have stepped right out of the movies. To grasp its secret, you should not, then, begin with the city and move inwards towards to the screen; you should begin with the screen and move out­wards to the city. ”

Towards the end of 2001, in a paper entitled “Pulling the World from our Eyes:
Hartt, Baudril­lard and The Matrix”
, I reflec­ted up on this quote from Baudril­lard in terms of the “Filmic Ima­gin­a­tion,” some­thing which I see as cent­ral to the theo­logy of Culture.

Where is the cinema? It is all around you out­side, all over the city, that mar­vel­lous, con­tinu­ous per­form­ance of films and scen­arios. Rather than film being a reflec­tion of our world, we now have a situ­ation where our world is a reflec­tion of film. Moreover, since so much of the world is, for many people, so much of the world is exper­i­enced cine­mat­ic­ally and tele­visu­ally before it is exper­i­enced in ‚Äúreal­ity,‚Äù the cine­matic shapes the expect­a­tion of real­ity. The rad­ical immance of our exper­i­ence stems in part from this per­form­a­tion in the filmic imagination.”

For Baudril­lard, film so shapes our ima­gin­a­tion that it now fills cat­egor­ies for how we describe our lives. It was like some­thing out of a movie, was such a con­stant refrain in the days fol­low­ing Septem­ber 11. How­ever, the same holds true in the more every­day. It never ceases to amaze me the way vis­it­ors to London anti­cip­ate what they will see on the basis of films and TV they con­sume. The frayed Bor­gian map in their mind is one cre­ated by the cine­matic exper­i­ence, be it Not­ting Hill, Slid­ing Doors, Brid­get Jones‚Äôs Diary, or Lock Stock and Two Smoking Bar­rells. What this says, in very subtle way, is that rather than expect­ing our exper­i­ence of film and cinema to match real­ity as we exper­i­ence it, we anti­cip­ate that real­ity, when we exper­i­ence it, will match the non-reality we have already exper­i­enced. There­fore our Bor­gean map is actu­ally a map drawn from our exper­i­ence of non-reality.”

Tech­nor­ati Tags: , , ,

Comments are closed.

Switch to our mobile site