Yet More Film Micro-Reviews

The Name­sake — Very impress­ive work from Mira Nair, dir­ector of the excel­lent Mon­soon Wed­ding (adap­ted from a novel by Jhumpa Lahiri). One of the most grip­ping por­tray­als of the first and second gen­er­a­tion immig­rant exper­i­ence that I have seen. Strong cast, smart cine­ma­to­graphy (espe­cially the use of colour), witty and intel­li­gent script, fine mix of source and soundtrack music and a power­ful blend of sym­pathy and anti­pathy. Must-see film.

Res­id­ent Evil: Extinc­tion — Like most films based on com­puter games, Res­id­ent Evil 3 is pat­ently absurd, obscenely loud and por­no­graph­ic­ally viol­ent. But, unlike most films of this genre, it is some­what enter­tain­ing. This is in no small part due to the fact that the oblig­at­ory pop­u­lar film ref­er­ences (includ­ing The Birds, For­bid­den Planet and Planet of the Apes) are not ref­er­enced in cliched one-liners but actu­ally re-created within the set­tings and action of the film. Quite intel­li­gent as far as this sort of stuff goes.

1408 — Pos­sibly the most mor­ally bank­rupt film of the decade. For the most part, this is a droll adapt­a­tion of a Stephen King short story that has neither the sub­stance nor the con­cep­tual frame­work to fill a feature-length film. Samuel L. Jack­son imper­son­ates Samuel L. Jack­son, John Cusak imper­son­ates a first year drama stu­dent and every­one else is as for­get­table as the score and the simplistic effects. The real prob­lem stems from the way the film evokes the tragic death of a young child. When a film does this and pushes us to con­sider both the child and athe parent’s suf­fer­ing it cre­ates, no, it demands some treat­ment and explor­a­tion of the human con­di­tion. A fail­ure to do so makes any film not only manip­u­lat­ive, but mor­ally dele­ter­i­ous. 1408 is such a film.

Bury My Heart At Wounded Knee — Some­what dis­ap­point­ing sepia-drenched adapt­a­tion of Dee Brown‚Äôs massively import­ant (and tightly researched) his­tory of the Native Amer­ican struggles during the late 19th cen­tury. The film focusses on the period from from the Battle At Little Big Horn to the Mas­sacre at Wounded Knee and although it reveals little to anyone famil­iar with the his­tory, it is worth seeing as a reminder of the tragedy and of course, as an eye-opener for anyone (is there anyone?) unfa­mil­iar with this sad era in Amer­ican history.

4 Responses to “Yet More Film Micro-Reviews”

  1. Paul says:

    i’ll never under­stand why stephen king is so mangled in most of his film adap­tions. After The Shin­ing and Shawshank i’m really strug­gling [altho the tv series of IT was quite good as well!]… Any the­or­ies on why this would be?

  2. rudy says:

    i just saw casino royale, i’d be inter­ested in your thoughts, i really liked it

  3. I sus­pect that Stephen King’s stor­ies get boiled down to the basic idea, given that high-concept film-making is the order of the day. The two films you men­tion are great because they don’t just play on the concept (or trick) in the story, but they retain the nar­rat­ive arc and the devel­op­ment of the char­ac­ters through the story.

  4. Rudy — I was very impressed with Casino Royale. Easily the best of the recent Bond Films and up there with the the better old ones.

    Although I like Brosnan as an actor, the films were becom­ing too gen­eric — too many explo­sions and too much tech­no­logy. This one used tech­no­logy, but with occa­sional con­tempt for it, pre­fer­ring to be more direct and hands on. I also liked the way it under­cut some of the clas­sic ele­ments, like the drink, the car chase and even the bond girl. Eva Green was a great, modern, very un-American love interest and the scene where Bond comes out of the ocean (à la Ursula Andress and Halle Berry) was priceless.

    Very good.

Switch to our mobile site